good artlcle on the gsx-s1000 - Suzuki GSXS1000 Forum
User Tag List

 9Likes
  • 8 Post By rebobd
  • 1 Post By rcannon409
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 Old 04-19-2016, 08:59 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
rebobd is offline  
post #2 of 10 Old 04-19-2016, 09:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Thumper07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Great article and morning coffee read at the office, thank you




1-1986 Harley Sportster 883
2-1992 Suzuki Bandit 600
3-1993 Kawaski Ninja 600
4-1994 Suzuki GSXR600
5-1995 Buell M2 Cyclone
6-1996 Honda VTR1000
7-1997 Suzuki Hayabusa

8-1997 Suzuki DR650
9-1998 Yamaha VStar 1100
10-2000 Kawaski Z1000
11-2003 Yamaha FZ1
12-2005 Ducati S2R 1000
13-2006 Honda CBR600RR
14-2007 Honda CBR1000RR
15-2007 Aprilia Tuono 1000
16-2013 Harley Davidson Switchback

17-2016 Suzuki GSXS1000


Thumper07 is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 04-20-2016, 01:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Great article from someone that seems to understand and/or enjoy the intent of the bike. As opposed to Motorcyclist ragging on the GSX-S1000 in the current issue (June 2016) where it is picked last to the FJ09 (really) being first choice and Ninja 1000 second. Maybe Motorcyclist is not on Suzuki's preferred publication list?

Last edited by rickster; 04-20-2016 at 02:12 AM.
rickster is offline  
 
post #4 of 10 Old 04-20-2016, 04:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Thumper07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Here's Motorcyclists review. It doesn't seem to have come in last place. In fact, they rave about how it was the fastest naked bike there that made them feel like they were riding a fully faired sport bike. Naked Bike Shootout: Honda CB1000R vs. Kawasaki Z1000 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs. Yamaha FZ-09 | MOTORCYCLIST




1-1986 Harley Sportster 883
2-1992 Suzuki Bandit 600
3-1993 Kawaski Ninja 600
4-1994 Suzuki GSXR600
5-1995 Buell M2 Cyclone
6-1996 Honda VTR1000
7-1997 Suzuki Hayabusa

8-1997 Suzuki DR650
9-1998 Yamaha VStar 1100
10-2000 Kawaski Z1000
11-2003 Yamaha FZ1
12-2005 Ducati S2R 1000
13-2006 Honda CBR600RR
14-2007 Honda CBR1000RR
15-2007 Aprilia Tuono 1000
16-2013 Harley Davidson Switchback

17-2016 Suzuki GSXS1000


Thumper07 is offline  
post #5 of 10 Old 04-20-2016, 10:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Thumper07, Yes saw that, but it was from January. The article I'm referring to just came in the June issue. Why their seeming change of heart as it doesn't seem consistent.
rickster is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 04-20-2016, 11:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Thumper07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Yeah they are always like that. New
Technology perhaps. I remember back when I bought my CBR600rr. I did so because it won hands down best handling bike around. 3 months after I bought it, it came in last place. Just goes to show how we can never listen to their crap.



Thumper07 is offline  
post #7 of 10 Old 04-21-2016, 07:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Thumper, Ooooh that's frustrating!! Well, I hope that bike, as well as the GSX, were purchased based on what rings your bell, not some motojournalist .
rickster is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 04-21-2016, 09:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
I think the magazines lost me back in 2012. I had just replaced the tires on my Ninja 1000, a whole 350.00 dollars worth, and that changed the front fork, the handling, and the overall feel of the bike, and it changed it a lot. Flaws I thought (and read) were there disappeared.

I know they cant change tires on motorcycles.....uh, why? We will have a set of tires burned up before we've made five payments. We have to assume most bikes come with poor tires, and it this gives us a true story of what we are riding, why the f not? Plus, they could easily sign on a tire supplier, and get them free.

I realized, then, we are the review, and they are trying to keep up with us. You told me how tires change it. How booster plug might help. How the powercommander did, etc. Right now, we are years ahead of where they are.

About Motorcyclist. It had to be around 2005 when one of their editors signed up for an account on the sv650 forum. You could probably search there and find it.

A few months later, I'll be damned if Ari's not an sv650 expert and adding a zx10 rear shock to his sv, and doing some other things he found on OUR forum. He did give a casual mention, but it was obviously HIS ideas. Not the forums.

Magazines are circling the drain. I think picking flat out winners, and making odd choices, gets them noticed.
rcannon409 is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 04-22-2016, 01:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
rcannnon409, Wow what racket. I thought I'd be avoiding that by subscribing to Motorcycle Consumer News as they don't take advertising (BTW, I felt their GSX-S1000 was a fair review). But maybe you never know.
rickster is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 04-22-2016, 08:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
`Motorcycle Consumer News is ....well, how can I say this. They mean well.

Their tests are written by guys originating from.......ok, lets say we grab two of us here, at random, and give us a printing press.

They tested a Honda something a year back. I remember them saying, We broke one sidepanal trying to remove it. We never did get the other one off.

OK, is that an acceptably answer to go to print with?

Thats where they miss. No follow through. A call to Honda tech support, a visit to a dealer, it was a bad place to leave us hanging.

Thats the problem, there. You dont get professional test riders. You get a few of us. Which is fine, except we are here, 24/7 and dont charge you 30.00, per year for our mis-information.

If you want a sample, of a good magazine, go onto ebay. Search "Cycle World 1981-1982" Buy one with something you like on the cover, and you'll see.

The other problem is this. I've never tried the fj09, but have ridden the fz09.

If you had all three bikes in your garage.

You would like the fz. Its small feeling, and its engine sounds cool.

You'd love the snap, the 2500-4000 wheelie the ninja 1000 offers.

You already have the suzuki.

To call one bad is foolish, and no one would.

Now, you have to rate them.

OK, so the yamaha is down 40 hp on the suzuki. The Kawasaki is nice, but 30lbs heavier.

The suzuki has fuel issues, and its suspension is too stiff.

2/3 of the readers will be angry, no matter who wins.
dekker likes this.
rcannon409 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Suzuki GSXS1000 Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome