Correct sorry I meant to say Heated Grips. My bad, here in Oz they want around $640.00 AUD for OMG Grips. I can buy the aftermarket Oxford for around $140.00 AUD and the Apollo for around the $200.00 AUD
I've got the chinese knock off of that snapjack Side Bike Stand Bike Portable Quick Stand Fit For Suzuki GSX-S1000 GSX-S1000F | eBay . I did make one [a bit of threaded bar and tube with a nut welded on], but wasnt 100% with it on anything but flat surfaces. The pop jack works a treat - when I do some touring itll help any rear wheel tweaks [i put a scottoiler on last week, so hope it won't be to do lubing].
Correct sorry I meant to say Heated Grips. My bad, here in Oz they want around $640.00 AUD for OMG Grips. I can buy the aftermarket Oxford for around $140.00 AUD and the Apollo for around the $200.00 AUDCC is standard on the GT.
It comes back to what you are comfortable with. You are the one that has to ride your bike and no one else. So I do as much research as I can or go with my experiences over the years then do what makes me feel good about my decision. I would not knock you or anyone doing what you want to your bikes as you pay for them and as I mentioned above ride them. I have to be honest at my age I tend to ride too fast and need to slow down lol Hence a Sport Touring bike works best for me.I found this interesting:
"Motorcycle manufacturers put their bikes through rigorous testing to find the right size tyres for both front and rear, and some bikes are very tyre sensitive. Changing from a 190/50 to 190/55 rear or vice versa may only serve to further highlight a handling problem, which is why we recommend that you look in your bike manufacturer’s handbook for more information regards tyre sizes. Technically changing sizes would also mean a slight change in gearing as the tyre’s diametre has changed, along with tweeks to the suspension to allow for a change in ride height."
From: http://www.cambriantyres.co.uk/motorcycle-rear-tyres-50-or-55-whats-the-difference/#:~:text=A 190/50 rear tyre,along with quicker turn in.
I'm going to ride with the OEM tire size and let the bike tell me what's best. Also, this is a sport-touring bike, after all, and quick turn-in, while nice on a sport bike, isn't the real mission the GT is designed for. Everything in life is a compromise - a sport bike turns quicker, but is less comfortable; a sport-touring bike turns in slower, but is more comfortable.
Let me start with the age thing. I, too, tend to ride fast (there really is no other way to properly ride an S1000RR, but that's another topic), and want to ease off a bit and enjoy the scenery. I can't tell you how many 1,000 foot deep river canyons I've ridden along and had eyes for the road ahead only, because that RR wants to giddyup. Hence the Suzuki.It comes back to what you are comfortable with. You are the one that has to ride your bike and no one else. So I do as much research as I can or go with my experiences over the years then do what makes me feel good about my decision. I would not knock you or anyone doing what you want to your bikes as you pay for them and as I mentioned above ride them. I have to be honest at my age I tend to ride too fast and need to slow down lol Hence a Sport Touring bike works best for me.
I cant agree more with what you have said. I have never been one to change too much on bikes unless it makes the bike more comfortable for me and at 67 years old 68 years, in June, I need that comfort more than say 10 years ago lol. I still love the speed and feeling of dropping the bike into a fast corner along with the odd sprint on the straights. I should just be happy riding along and enjoying the scenery but the devil takes over a bit too often. lol. Saying that I still won't ever endanger any other person I am riding with or sharing the road with. I am about 98% sure Suzuki will be fine in the comfort and power department to keep me happy.Let me start with the age thing. I, too, tend to ride fast (there really is no other way to properly ride an S1000RR, but that's another topic), and want to ease off a bit and enjoy the scenery. I can't tell you how many 1,000 foot deep river canyons I've ridden along and had eyes for the road ahead only, because that RR wants to giddyup. Hence the Suzuki.
As for doing what's comfortable for oneself...amen. I can recall numerous forum members on other motorcycle forums, who buy a new bike and, having read comments about "I'm gonna flash that ECU the minute I get the bike", or "I'm going to get a full titanium exhaust and THEN flash that ECU, put on magnesium wheels, change the gearing and rip up the road between my house and Starbucks...", decide they need to take their perfectly good, new motorcycle and start changing a bunch of stuff before they've gone 500 miles. A few months later these guys are on the forum saying, "I did all that stuff and the bike stalls at 78 mph for some reason", or "Why does my idle rpm fluctuate between 1400 and 5000 rpm?"...or, worst, "My bike won't start now".
So, yeah, I'm comfortable leaving the bike as it is from Suzuki and will see how I feel after a few thousand miles. If a bike needs too many changes right out of the factory, something's wrong. Somehow I can't picture Suzuki screwing up a new model, though...
I don't think, well know that I won't be doing any mods other than changing the tyres to Pirelli, adding heated Grips so warranty won't be an issue, Maybe the Rox Riser/pullback for the bars that won't affect the warranty anyway. I read that Suzuki doesn't even want you to do your own oil changes etc. in between the normal schedule services, to keep the 3-year manufacturer's warranty. I suspect if you did that with a Suzuki Authorised dealer then that won't matter.I will be leaving the bike standard at least until the warranty expires.
I don’t look at it as Suzuki screwing up a new model … more the fact manufacturers sell to people and we are the screwed up ones. They ( manufacturers) will never be able to make a one size fits all.If a bike needs too many changes right out of the factory, something's wrong. Somehow I can't picture Suzuki screwing up a new model, though...
Oh, boy...this reminded me of a couple of dealer-related experiences I've had. One not too terrible, the other...horrible. First one was when I took my BMW RR in for service and instead of the guy who usually works on it, I get a "new" guy because the experienced guy was busy with a hurry-up job for a police BMW RT. I get the bike back and the drain hoses weren't routed right, the service indicator not re-set, the chain way over-tight and greasy finger/hand prints all over the fairing. I complained and the "experienced" guy fixed it all. Second experience was making an appointment a month ahead of time for the "major" 18,000-mile service. Dropped off bike on appointed day, knowing this was a big service and it might take a couple of days. A week passes...no word. WTF? I email the service writer and ask...how's it going? I leave the house, come back to a voicemail message: "Sorry...we haven't started on the bike yet." Say...what? Long email to Service Manager basically saying, "excuse me...what the *&^% is going on here?" He fixed it...the bike's service was completed immediately in one long day.Luckily at the time the dealership I dealt with had a old timer really good technician and the rebuild went smooth. That is certainly not the case with most dealerships stateside now days.
Mine will be changed the day I take it out of the creat, during the Predelivery I agree with going with the 190/55 and also changing from Dunlop to another brand that I will also be doing on the day.I'll will be using a 190/55 quite soon after I get mine. That was one of the issues with the Concours and Ninja 1000. It helped them turn in dramatically better going to the 55.
im sorry I am confused what did you mean. Lol are you trying to buy my tires?Now that I can do. Probably cost me that much to have them put the new ones on though, you’re a tech, so it’s just sweat equity.